Henry Searle vs James Beaven Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Searle has secured 46.66% of points from their second serve in the past six months, slightly outperforming Beaven's 43.87%. Could this be a key determinant in predicting match outcomes? Evidence suggests it may be.
• On return stats, Searle shows dominance with 46.76% success against opponents' second serves, compared to Beaven's 41.42%. How does this impact their head-to-head prediction? It strongly favors Searle.
• Beaven leads slightly in first serve return performance, winning 27.4% of points versus 25.08% by Searle, hinting at a minor edge in returning those serves.
• In pressure situations, Searle's breakpoint save rate is 59.68% while Beaven's is 52.17%, suggesting a slight resilience advantage for Searle.
• Over the last year, Beaven has a better overall match win percentage at 60.98%, whereas Searle maintains 54.72%. Does this tip the scales in Beaven's favor? Possibly, but requires further context.
• Both players excel on hard surfaces, with Searle winning 58% of such matches, while Beaven has a 49% win rate, showing a slight surface preference for Searle.
• Searle exhibits stronger performance in Futures/Satellite/ITF $10K events, achieving a 68% win rate compared to Beaven's 60.98%.
• Player ranking faced reveals Searle contended with opponents averaging a rank of 367.06, whereas Beaven faced stronger opposition with an average rank of 194.39.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, history shows Searle succeeds 40% of the time, compared to 33% for Beaven, providing a marginal deciding set advantage to Searle.
• Recent breakpoint conversion rates show Beaven leading with 28.57% success, whereas Searle scores 25.32%, offering Beaven a slight tactical advantage here.

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Searle and Beaven presents an intriguing duel between two players with distinct strengths.

Searle demonstrates stronger performance in pressure moments, particularly when saving breakpoints and competing on their second serve. This resilience might play a crucial role in tight match situations.

Beaven, on the other hand, enters the match with a better overall win-loss record for the year and has faced tougher opposition, potentially preparing them for higher-level competition.

Considering these factors, Searle's edge in second serve performance and return game against second serves may narrow the margin if the match becomes a tactical battle.

Nonetheless, Beaven's ability to convert break points and past exposure to higher-ranked opponents could give them the ultimate edge in tighter scenarios.

Overall, Beaven emerges as the slight favorite to win this encounter, mainly due to their superior overall performance and experience against stronger opponents.